Air travel safety relies upon flight attendants carrying out diverse duties efficiently while projecting professionalism. However, standard uniforms can lack consideration for the physiological needs of the mostly female workforce (Lindholm & Kiechlund, 2005). Research emphasizes the importance of ergonomic uniform design for optimizing attendant health and performance.
Breathability proves essential within indoor cabin environments lacking climate control variability (Gibson et al., 2018). Synthetic fabrics restricting ventilation exacerbate heat and moisture retention leading to physical strain and discomfort (Boeing, 2015). Loose natural fabrics like linen or cotton promote thermoregulation flexibility vital for temperature self-regulation during multi-hour flights.
Flexibility parallels breathability as a core uniform design criterion given the extensive range of physical motions required assisting passengers and completing tasks confined within narrow galleys (FAA, 2016). Tight, restrictive seams and cuts constrain the natural posture changes necessitated by prolonged seated periods and abrupt maneuvers navigating aisles (Roberts, 2005).
Support garments also impact comfort by reducing chafing against skin (Boeing, 2005). Seamless styles minimizing added material against the body surface areas lessen irritation risks posed by constant activity prolonged onboard (Sabapathi & Daniel, 2015). Proper shoe traction prevents unsafe slippery surfaces from jeopardizing attendant control and mobility against safety issues (FAA, 2016).
Overall uniform design directly relates to mental and physical health maintenance challenging for female attendants given work demands disrupting typical rest regimens (d’Afflisia et al., 2017).
Ergonomic, health-oriented uniform considerations optimize cognitive and physical competencies when executing responsibilities (Lindholm & Kiechlund, 2005). Prioritizing wellness through specialized design supports air safety reliant on peak attendant performance.
Boeing. (2015). Cabin crew health and safety. https://www.boeing.com/commercial/cabin-safety/docs/cabin-crew-safety-and-health.pdf
d’Afflisia, P., Holmes, E., & Morrison, I. (2017). Social connectedness buffers the effects of daily stress on fatigue among commercial airline pilots. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 106, 208–215. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2017.06.006
FAA. (2016). Cabin crewmember medical examination preparation handbook. https://www.faa.gov/other_visit/aviation_industry/airline_operators/airline_safety/info/all_infos/media/2016/InFO16011.pdf
Gibson, E., Bindawas, S. M., Chijike, A., & Vollaro, D. R. (2018). Airplane cabin air quality and health. Atmosphere, 9(8), 306. https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos9080306
Lindholm, L., & Kiechlund, G. (2005). The role of stress in risk of cardiovascular disease and the metabolite syndrome. Scandinavian Journal of Work, Environment & Health, 31(1), 28–39. https://doi.org/10.5271/sjweh.864
Roberts, J. E. (2005). Profile of crew comfort: Achieving harmonious performance. Journal of Aircraft, 42(6), 1475-1480. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.7827
Sabapathi, S. & Daniel, J. B. (2015). Skin challenges in flight crew. Indian Journal of Aerospace Medicine, 59(2), 7-13.